Differences Between Paralus and Rancher
Introduction
This document details the operational and functional differences between Rancher and Paralus. It is designed to assist users transitioning from Rancher to Paralus by explaining the changes and adaptations they might expect.
User Interface and Interaction
Paralus provides a streamlined user interface centered around projects and clusters:
-
Projects in Paralus house multiple clusters, from which
kubeconfig
files can be directly downloaded for Kubernetes command-line tool (kubectl
) access via the Web UI. -
Unlike Rancher, Paralus does not currently support detailed views of pods or integrated Grafana and Prometheus dashboards for monitoring.
Cluster Management
Cluster management in Paralus differs notably from Rancher:
-
Clusters are organized under projects, and each cluster must be accessed individually to manage or download its specific
kubeconfig
. -
Health indicators in Paralus display as "healthy," contrasting with Rancherβs "active" status.
Limitations of Paralus
As a newly adopted Kubernetes cluster management tool, Paralus has several limitations:
-
The lack of a comprehensive dashboard means users cannot view nodes, workloads, apps, services, or storage directly in the UI.
-
To monitor pods and namespaces, users must resort to using
kubectl
commands. -
Unlike Rancher, Paralus does not offer a search functionality within the platform.